Continue exploring shared identity, interaction and context. Similarity describes recorded DNA overlap, not a probability that you will enjoy a game.
GAMEBOX algorithmic assessments of editorial Game DNA. Confidence describes overlap strength, not a probability of enjoyment.
1998
76% SIMILAR
STRONG MATCH
Strategic planning · Companion journey · Epic · Thoughtful · RPG
WHY IT'S SIMILAR
Both games share Strategic planning experiences (weighing resources and planning consequential decisions) and Companion journey experiences (building an experience around relationships with companions); Epic / Thoughtful mood; RPG genre.
Similarity breakdown
- experience: Companion journey · Role immersion · Strategic planning77% distinctive overlap · 60.8 / 79.0 points
- mood: Epic · Thoughtful100% distinctive overlap · 47.3 / 47.3 points
- genre: RPG100% distinctive overlap · 19.5 / 19.5 points
- gameplay: Character Building · Exploration · Role Playing100% distinctive overlap · 21.7 / 21.7 points
- structure: No shared values0% distinctive overlap · 0.0 / 27.7 points
- pacing: Slow100% distinctive overlap · 10.1 / 10.1 points
- perspective: Isometric68% distinctive overlap · 8.0 / 11.9 points
- difficulty: Medium100% distinctive overlap · 2.7 / 2.7 points
- era: No shared values0% distinctive overlap · 0.0 / 4.0 points
1997
75% SIMILAR
STRONG MATCH
Strategic planning · Player agency · Epic · Thoughtful · RPG
WHY IT'S SIMILAR
Both games share Strategic planning experiences (weighing resources and planning consequential decisions) and Player agency experiences (shaping outcomes through consequential choices or approaches); Epic / Thoughtful mood; RPG genre.
Similarity breakdown
- experience: Player agency · Role immersion · Strategic planning74% distinctive overlap · 56.9 / 77.3 points
- mood: Epic · Thoughtful100% distinctive overlap · 47.3 / 47.3 points
- genre: RPG100% distinctive overlap · 19.5 / 19.5 points
- gameplay: Character Building · Exploration · Role Playing100% distinctive overlap · 21.7 / 21.7 points
- structure: No shared values0% distinctive overlap · 0.0 / 27.7 points
- pacing: Slow100% distinctive overlap · 10.1 / 10.1 points
- perspective: Isometric68% distinctive overlap · 8.0 / 11.9 points
- difficulty: Medium100% distinctive overlap · 2.7 / 2.7 points
- era: No shared values0% distinctive overlap · 0.0 / 4.0 points
1998
75% SIMILAR
STRONG MATCH
Strategic planning · Player agency · Epic · Thoughtful · RPG
WHY IT'S SIMILAR
Both games share Strategic planning experiences (weighing resources and planning consequential decisions) and Player agency experiences (shaping outcomes through consequential choices or approaches); Epic / Thoughtful mood; RPG genre.
Similarity breakdown
- experience: Player agency · Role immersion · Strategic planning74% distinctive overlap · 56.9 / 77.3 points
- mood: Epic · Thoughtful100% distinctive overlap · 47.3 / 47.3 points
- genre: RPG100% distinctive overlap · 19.5 / 19.5 points
- gameplay: Character Building · Exploration · Role Playing100% distinctive overlap · 21.7 / 21.7 points
- structure: No shared values0% distinctive overlap · 0.0 / 27.7 points
- pacing: Slow100% distinctive overlap · 10.1 / 10.1 points
- perspective: Isometric68% distinctive overlap · 8.0 / 11.9 points
- difficulty: Medium100% distinctive overlap · 2.7 / 2.7 points
- era: No shared values0% distinctive overlap · 0.0 / 4.0 points
1998
74% SIMILAR
STRONG MATCH
Epic · Thoughtful · Strategic planning · Role immersion · RPG
WHY IT'S SIMILAR
Both games share Epic / Thoughtful mood; Strategic planning experiences (weighing resources and planning consequential decisions) and Role immersion experiences (inhabiting and developing a character within a world); RPG genre.
Similarity breakdown
- experience: Role immersion · Strategic planning43% distinctive overlap · 32.0 / 74.2 points
- mood: Epic · Thoughtful100% distinctive overlap · 47.3 / 47.3 points
- genre: RPG100% distinctive overlap · 19.5 / 19.5 points
- gameplay: Character Building · Exploration · Role Playing100% distinctive overlap · 21.7 / 21.7 points
- structure: Hub-based100% distinctive overlap · 29.8 / 29.8 points
- pacing: Slow100% distinctive overlap · 10.1 / 10.1 points
- perspective: No shared values0% distinctive overlap · 0.0 / 12.1 points
- difficulty: Medium100% distinctive overlap · 2.7 / 2.7 points
- era: No shared values0% distinctive overlap · 0.0 / 4.0 points
2007
73% SIMILAR
STRONG MATCH
Epic · Thoughtful · Companion journey · Player agency · RPG
WHY IT'S SIMILAR
Both games share Epic / Thoughtful mood; Companion journey experiences (building an experience around relationships with companions) and Player agency experiences (shaping outcomes through consequential choices or approaches); RPG genre.
Similarity breakdown
- experience: Companion journey · Player agency42% distinctive overlap · 31.1 / 73.7 points
- mood: Epic · Thoughtful100% distinctive overlap · 47.3 / 47.3 points
- genre: RPG100% distinctive overlap · 19.5 / 19.5 points
- gameplay: Character Building · Exploration · Role Playing100% distinctive overlap · 21.7 / 21.7 points
- structure: Hub-based100% distinctive overlap · 29.8 / 29.8 points
- pacing: No shared values0% distinctive overlap · 0.0 / 11.1 points
- perspective: Third-person32% distinctive overlap · 2.7 / 8.4 points
- difficulty: Medium100% distinctive overlap · 2.7 / 2.7 points
- era: 2000s100% distinctive overlap · 3.6 / 3.6 points
1999
72% SIMILAR
STRONG MATCH
Epic · Thoughtful · Player agency · Role immersion · RPG
WHY IT'S SIMILAR
Both games share Epic / Thoughtful mood; Player agency experiences (shaping outcomes through consequential choices or approaches) and Role immersion experiences (inhabiting and developing a character within a world); RPG genre.
Similarity breakdown
- experience: Player agency · Role immersion29% distinctive overlap · 21.6 / 75.0 points
- mood: Epic · Thoughtful100% distinctive overlap · 47.3 / 47.3 points
- genre: RPG100% distinctive overlap · 19.5 / 19.5 points
- gameplay: Character Building · Exploration · Role Playing100% distinctive overlap · 21.7 / 21.7 points
- structure: Hub-based100% distinctive overlap · 29.8 / 29.8 points
- pacing: Slow100% distinctive overlap · 10.1 / 10.1 points
- perspective: Isometric68% distinctive overlap · 8.0 / 11.9 points
- difficulty: Medium100% distinctive overlap · 2.7 / 2.7 points
- era: No shared values0% distinctive overlap · 0.0 / 4.0 points
2004
72% SIMILAR
STRONG MATCH
Epic · Thoughtful · Companion journey · Role immersion · RPG
WHY IT'S SIMILAR
Both games share Epic / Thoughtful mood; Companion journey experiences (building an experience around relationships with companions) and Role immersion experiences (inhabiting and developing a character within a world); RPG genre.
Similarity breakdown
- experience: Companion journey · Role immersion40% distinctive overlap · 28.5 / 72.1 points
- mood: Epic · Thoughtful100% distinctive overlap · 47.3 / 47.3 points
- genre: RPG100% distinctive overlap · 19.5 / 19.5 points
- gameplay: Character Building · Exploration · Role Playing100% distinctive overlap · 21.7 / 21.7 points
- structure: Hub-based100% distinctive overlap · 29.8 / 29.8 points
- pacing: No shared values0% distinctive overlap · 0.0 / 11.1 points
- perspective: Third-person32% distinctive overlap · 2.7 / 8.4 points
- difficulty: Medium100% distinctive overlap · 2.7 / 2.7 points
- era: 2000s100% distinctive overlap · 3.6 / 3.6 points
2010
63% SIMILAR
GOOD MATCH
Epic · Thoughtful · Player agency · Role immersion · RPG
WHY IT'S SIMILAR
Both games share Epic / Thoughtful mood; Player agency experiences (shaping outcomes through consequential choices or approaches) and Role immersion experiences (inhabiting and developing a character within a world); RPG genre.
Similarity breakdown
- experience: Player agency · Role immersion43% distinctive overlap · 31.3 / 72.6 points
- mood: Epic · Thoughtful100% distinctive overlap · 47.3 / 47.3 points
- genre: RPG100% distinctive overlap · 19.5 / 19.5 points
- gameplay: Character Building · Exploration · Role Playing100% distinctive overlap · 21.7 / 21.7 points
- structure: No shared values0% distinctive overlap · 0.0 / 27.7 points
- pacing: Slow100% distinctive overlap · 10.1 / 10.1 points
- perspective: Third-person23% distinctive overlap · 2.0 / 8.7 points
- difficulty: Medium100% distinctive overlap · 2.7 / 2.7 points
- era: No shared values0% distinctive overlap · 0.0 / 4.2 points
2001
62% SIMILAR
GOOD MATCH
Epic · Thoughtful · Player agency · Role immersion · RPG
WHY IT'S SIMILAR
Both games share Epic / Thoughtful mood; Player agency experiences (shaping outcomes through consequential choices or approaches) and Role immersion experiences (inhabiting and developing a character within a world); RPG genre.
Similarity breakdown
- experience: Player agency · Role immersion35% distinctive overlap · 25.7 / 73.8 points
- mood: Epic · Thoughtful100% distinctive overlap · 47.3 / 47.3 points
- genre: RPG100% distinctive overlap · 19.5 / 19.5 points
- gameplay: Character Building · Exploration · Role Playing100% distinctive overlap · 21.7 / 21.7 points
- structure: No shared values0% distinctive overlap · 0.0 / 27.7 points
- pacing: Slow100% distinctive overlap · 10.1 / 10.1 points
- perspective: Third-person32% distinctive overlap · 2.7 / 8.4 points
- difficulty: Medium100% distinctive overlap · 2.7 / 2.7 points
- era: 2000s100% distinctive overlap · 3.6 / 3.6 points